<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday5: Indispensable Web Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattmckimmy.com/blog/2008/04/18/friday5-indispensable-web-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattmckimmy.com/blog/2008/04/18/friday5-indispensable-web-apps/</link>
	<description>Computers, Cooking, Cars, Christianity, and More ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmckimmy.com/blog/2008/04/18/friday5-indispensable-web-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmckimmy.com/blog/?p=48#comment-38</guid>
		<description>@Josie&#039;s side note: Being a Debian-based distribution, Ubuntu uses .deb packages for installing pre-compiled software with specified dependencies. It is similar to the way Red Hat-based distributions use .rpm files. If you&#039;re having trouble finding a program that&#039;s not in Synaptic Package Manager, you might try a site like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.getdeb.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GetDeb.net&lt;/a&gt; to see if you can find what you&#039;re looking for. When you download and install a .deb file it will automatically check for and install any applicable dependencies. I hope that helps! 

Also, be sure to check back soon for my upcoming post on Ubuntu 8.04 aka &quot;Hardy Heron.&quot; Now that it&#039;s out of beta I&#039;ll be loading it up on my machines in the next couple of weeks. How about that ... this comment ended up not being so far off-topic after all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Josie&#8217;s side note: Being a Debian-based distribution, Ubuntu uses .deb packages for installing pre-compiled software with specified dependencies. It is similar to the way Red Hat-based distributions use .rpm files. If you&#8217;re having trouble finding a program that&#8217;s not in Synaptic Package Manager, you might try a site like <a href="http://www.getdeb.net" rel="nofollow">GetDeb.net</a> to see if you can find what you&#8217;re looking for. When you download and install a .deb file it will automatically check for and install any applicable dependencies. I hope that helps! </p>
<p>Also, be sure to check back soon for my upcoming post on Ubuntu 8.04 aka &#8220;Hardy Heron.&#8221; Now that it&#8217;s out of beta I&#8217;ll be loading it up on my machines in the next couple of weeks. How about that &#8230; this comment ended up not being so far off-topic after all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josie</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmckimmy.com/blog/2008/04/18/friday5-indispensable-web-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Josie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmckimmy.com/blog/?p=48#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I guess I still avoid betas unless I am willing to invest the time into sending suggestions on fixing an app or at least dealing with semi-constant crashes and major problems.

On a side note, I was looking at Ubuntu and I noticed that it seems awfully hard to get packages that work with its package manager.  Is there a seachable package database out there with SPMs?  If I can
t find one then I think I will stick with Linux that uses RPMs.  I would probably be eventually able to figure out the installation, but I am so prone to forget some dependency with a manual install.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I still avoid betas unless I am willing to invest the time into sending suggestions on fixing an app or at least dealing with semi-constant crashes and major problems.</p>
<p>On a side note, I was looking at Ubuntu and I noticed that it seems awfully hard to get packages that work with its package manager.  Is there a seachable package database out there with SPMs?  If I can<br />
t find one then I think I will stick with Linux that uses RPMs.  I would probably be eventually able to figure out the installation, but I am so prone to forget some dependency with a manual install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmckimmy.com/blog/2008/04/18/friday5-indispensable-web-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmckimmy.com/blog/?p=48#comment-23</guid>
		<description>@ Chris - Er, um ... actually, 4 out of the 5 are. The only one not labeled as &quot;beta&quot; is Google Reader. I think that the whole beta thing is tied to the fact that companies don&#039;t want to admit that all programs might have some bugs in them and they feel that calling their products betas will mean their customers cut them some slack. 

Gmail is a great example of this since it&#039;s been out for years and is used by thousands of people all while being branded as a beta. In many ways I think that the current &quot;beta craze&quot; can probably be traced back to Google leaving Gmail as a beta for so long. I&#039;ve gotten to the point where I hardly even notice when something is labeled as a beta because it&#039;s become almost meaningless in its usage for web-apps. 

I&#039;m also starting to see a similar trend in pre-1.0 branded offline applications, particularly in the open source community. Such apps are launched publicly at something ludicrous like 0.1.38.4 and then might slowly, over the course of a few years, work their way up to 0.47.9.2 as they slowly strive for the coveted &quot;1.0&quot; release. I think both these practices simply lead end-users to ignore labels like beta and version numbers since they&#039;re used in such confusing and sometimes misleading ways. That&#039;s my 0.2.56.9 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Chris &#8211; Er, um &#8230; actually, 4 out of the 5 are. The only one not labeled as &#8220;beta&#8221; is Google Reader. I think that the whole beta thing is tied to the fact that companies don&#8217;t want to admit that all programs might have some bugs in them and they feel that calling their products betas will mean their customers cut them some slack. </p>
<p>Gmail is a great example of this since it&#8217;s been out for years and is used by thousands of people all while being branded as a beta. In many ways I think that the current &#8220;beta craze&#8221; can probably be traced back to Google leaving Gmail as a beta for so long. I&#8217;ve gotten to the point where I hardly even notice when something is labeled as a beta because it&#8217;s become almost meaningless in its usage for web-apps. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also starting to see a similar trend in pre-1.0 branded offline applications, particularly in the open source community. Such apps are launched publicly at something ludicrous like 0.1.38.4 and then might slowly, over the course of a few years, work their way up to 0.47.9.2 as they slowly strive for the coveted &#8220;1.0&#8243; release. I think both these practices simply lead end-users to ignore labels like beta and version numbers since they&#8217;re used in such confusing and sometimes misleading ways. That&#8217;s my 0.2.56.9 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mattmckimmy.com/blog/2008/04/18/friday5-indispensable-web-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattmckimmy.com/blog/?p=48#comment-21</guid>
		<description>So, what does it mean the 3 of the 5 apps you named are still in &quot;Beta&quot;? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what does it mean the 3 of the 5 apps you named are still in &#8220;Beta&#8221;? <img src='http://www.mattmckimmy.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

